[{"Value":"","Discard":false,"Expires":9999999999}]
The post Encourage Your Team and Elevate Accountability – Part Four appeared first on SALT Community.
]]>
You’ve probably heard the old adage “It’s not personal, it’s just business”, but when it comes to building buy-in and elevating the accountability of your team, it’s always personal because at the heart of any good working relationship lies an actual relationship.
I’m surprised how often I meet leaders who miss this. It’s not like they’re ogres or misanthropes. They just fall into the groove of their work environment and the functional transactions that happen with team members and colleagues and they lose sight of the genuine personal relationships at the core. That’s a problem because it turns out that your ability to call people to greater accountability and commitment is directly connected to the strength of your relationship with them. Where relationships are shallow or perfunctory, accountability usually is too.
This means that leaders looking to strengthen their leadership may need to take stock of their relationships more than their organizational skills. In fact, some of the very things they do to manage time, improve efficiency, and get more done have a way of diluting their relationships, distancing others, and damaging the commitment of their teams.
If you want to build buy-in and elevate the accountability of your team members, loosen your grip on efficiency just a little and cultivate their sense of an ongoing relationship with these two tactics
In our daily work, we often interact with team members, but an ongoing relationship is more than simply a collection of interactions, and the difference is continuity– the sense that these encounters are part of an ongoing story. An “interaction” happens incidentally and holds your attention only temporarily. You tune in when its pertinent and tune out when it’s not. So, there’s no real connection between these moments over time, no continuity. A relationship, on the other hand, is enduring. It’s a story perpetually “in progress” and a part of your heart, if not your attention, is permanently subscribed to it. You never fully tune out because it’s always pertinent.
That kind of continuity is hard to find in organizations because the rush of activities and expectations compartmentalizes experience and reduces most relationships to utilitarian transactions. But if you want to foster accountability, you need to fight this effect. Here are three tactics that will help you boost the continuity and improve relationships in the rush of everything else.
Let’s face it, real relationships are seldom neat or tidy. They don’t always fit comfortably in a Day Timer and they often sidetrack or slow down To Do Lists. As a result, many leaders cultivate a sort of emotional “buffer zone” between themselves and the people they lead. They figure that some psychological distance will keep them from getting tangled up in the kind of interpersonal drama that complicates things and slows their roll.
They’re probably right– when you’re aloof, you don’t get bogged down with as many relational issues. But you also don’t create the personal connection it takes to move your team members when it matters most. That kind of self-preservation and control comes at a price, and the price is paid in influence. You can’t stay above-the-fray or emotionally removed from your people and still be the kind of leader that inspires or influences them in profound ways. There is an unbreakable reciprocity to influence that requires you to get closer, get messy, and get real if you want to make a big difference. Think of it this way: If you want to be close enough to impact your team members in meaningful ways, you’ll need to get close enough to be influenced meaningfully in return.
The post Encourage Your Team and Elevate Accountability – Part Four appeared first on SALT Community.
]]>The post 5 Foundations of Accountability appeared first on SALT Community.
]]>Accountability is a hot topic these days. It comes up in almost every context and organization I work with because teams always long for leaders who will own their actions, and leaders are always looking for higher engagement from their teams. What they both want is greater accountability. They know that people who feel accountable take more ownership of the mission and demonstrate deeper commitment, greater resilience, higher initiative, and better contributions. People who don’t feel accountable dodge ownership and bog things down, or back them up. They do things halfway, or simply fail to finish what they start.
Jesus illustrated this difference when he was debating the Pharisees in John 10. (Apparently accountability has always been a hot topic!) He told the Pharisees that a good shepherd will go so far as to give his life for the sheep, but a hired hand will run away and leave the sheep to fend for themselves if he sees a wolf coming. He’ll cut and run at the first sign of trouble because he thinks like a hired hand instead of an owner and he lacks the sense of accountability that would make him stay.
In 1 Samuel 17 you get a picture of what a shepherd would look like if he actually had that sense. The picture is of David. Not King David at this point, but wiry, young Boy David, and he’s trying to convince Saul that he’s ready to take on Goliath with no armor, and no sword. Saul, of course, tries to talk him out of it by reminding him that he’s just a puny kid and Goliath is a walking War Machine, but David is undeterred. When he responds, he doesn’t sound like the kind of guy who bails when things get tough. He tells Saul, “I used to keep sheep for my father. And when there came a lion, or a bear, and took a lamb from the flock, I went after him and struck him and delivered it out of his mouth. And if he turned on me, I caught him by his beard and struck him and killed him. I’ve struck down both lions and bears, and this uncircumcised Philistine will be like one of them, for he has defied the armies of the living God.” That’s not the voice or the attitude of a hired hand; it’s too full of personal commitment and initiative. That’s accountability.
People who feel accountable take more ownership of the mission and demonstrate deeper commitment
Ultimately accountability doesn’t just make the difference between owners and hired hands. It distinguishes any man or woman who is personally invested in the mission and will do whatever it takes to get the job done. Accountability is what moves them to make meaningful commitments to goals and expectations in process and take personal responsibility for results and implications after the fact.
Naturally leaders want to foster this attitude in their team members, but I find that their efforts are often misguided. They think accountability is fostered best in in difficult conversations that call out individuals’ failures or insufficiencies. So, they orchestrate myriad hit-and-run moments-of-reckoning they hope will elevate the commitment level of their people. This tactic is not only unpleasant, it’s counterproductive. It traps leaders in a vicious cycle where they are damaging the very sense of accountability they’re trying to foster and causing their people to step back instead of step up.
Accountability must be cultivated rather than commanded
The secret to avoiding this trap and building the commitment you want in your team is to remember that accountability is not something you do to your people. It is something they must do for themselves. Accountability is ultimately about a person’s willingness to account for his or her own actions. So, it’s a choice they make of their own volition. That means that accountability must be cultivated rather than commanded. It also means that if you want to increase it in your team members, your job isn’t to police their performance as much as it is to create the kind of culture and conditions that will lead them to make that choice again and again.
To help you in this, I’ve identified Five Foundations of Accountability:[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Accountability is a hot topic these days. It comes up in almost every context and organization I work with because teams always long for leaders who will own their actions, and leaders are always looking for higher engagement from their teams. What they both want is greater accountability. They know that people who feel accountable take more ownership of the mission and demonstrate deeper commitment, greater resilience, higher initiative, and better contributions. People who don’t feel accountable dodge ownership and bog things down, or back them up. They do things halfway, or simply fail to finish what they start.
Jesus illustrated this difference when he was debating the Pharisees in John 10. (Apparently accountability has always been a hot topic!) He told the Pharisees that a good shepherd will go so far as to give his life for the sheep, but a hired hand will run away and leave the sheep to fend for themselves if he sees a wolf coming. He’ll cut and run at the first sign of trouble because he thinks like a hired hand instead of an owner and he lacks the sense of accountability that would make him stay.
In 1 Samuel 17 you get a picture of what a shepherd would look like if he actually had that sense. The picture is of David. Not King David at this point, but wiry, young Boy David, and he’s trying to convince Saul that he’s ready to take on Goliath with no armor, and no sword. Saul, of course, tries to talk him out of it by reminding him that he’s just a puny kid and Goliath is a walking War Machine, but David is undeterred. When he responds, he doesn’t sound like the kind of guy who bails when things get tough. He tells Saul, “I used to keep sheep for my father. And when there came a lion, or a bear, and took a lamb from the flock, I went after him and struck him and delivered it out of his mouth. And if he turned on me, I caught him by his beard and struck him and killed him. I’ve struck down both lions and bears, and this uncircumcised Philistine will be like one of them, for he has defied the armies of the living God.” That’s not the voice or the attitude of a hired hand; it’s too full of personal commitment and initiative. That’s accountability.
People who feel accountable take more ownership of the mission and demonstrate deeper commitment
Ultimately accountability doesn’t just make the difference between owners and hired hands. It distinguishes any man or woman who is personally invested in the mission and will do whatever it takes to get the job done. Accountability is what moves them to make meaningful commitments to goals and expectations in process and take personal responsibility for results and implications after the fact.
Naturally leaders want to foster this attitude in their team members, but I find that their efforts are often misguided. They think accountability is fostered best in in difficult conversations that call out individuals’ failures or insufficiencies. So, they orchestrate myriad hit-and-run moments-of-reckoning they hope will elevate the commitment level of their people. This tactic is not only unpleasant, it’s counterproductive. It traps leaders in a vicious cycle where they are damaging the very sense of accountability they’re trying to foster and causing their people to step back instead of step up.
Accountability must be cultivated rather than commanded
The secret to avoiding this trap and building the commitment you want in your team is to remember that accountability is not something you do to your people. It is something they must do for themselves. Accountability is ultimately about a person’s willingness to account for his or her own actions. So, it’s a choice they make of their own volition. That means that accountability must be cultivated rather than commanded. It also means that if you want to increase it in your team members, your job isn’t to police their performance as much as it is to create the kind of culture and conditions that will lead them to make that choice again and again.
To help you in this, I’ve identified Five Foundations of Accountability:[/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”11826″ alignment=”center”][vc_column_text]These building blocks identify the leadership practices and priorities that can transform the initiative and engagement of your team. If you are successful in addressing them, you’ll find that your people step up their commitment and demonstrate the accountability you need. Similarly, if accountability is scarce and you feel like you have more than your share of hired hands, it’s likely one or more of these foundations is missing in your team’s experience.
If you are looking to go deeper in your leadership of creatives check out Dr. Andrew Johnston’s book, Fired Up: Kindling and Keeping the Spark in Creative Teams[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
The post 5 Foundations of Accountability appeared first on SALT Community.
]]>